Showing posts with label Higher Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Higher Education. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
University Rankings- India
Economic Times Reports
Nine of the 10 Indian Universities ranked 700th or above in the Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings 2016/17 have lost ground compared to last year in terms of both academic reputation and employer reputation.
Nine of the 10 Indian Universities ranked 700th or above in the Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings 2016/17 have lost ground compared to last year in terms of both academic reputation and employer reputation.
Read more at:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/54026745.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/54026745.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Business Standard reports...
A relatively low number of doctoral students coupled with globally insufficient faculty-student ratio have resulted in the Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Bangalore, along with six of seven top-ranked Indian Institutes of Technology(IITs), slip in the 13th edition of the QS World University Rankings 2016-17.
Friday, July 17, 2015
Higher Education: International Quality Principles from CHEA
Council for Higher Education Accreditation Washington (CHEA)
International
Quality Principles (May 2015)
1 Quality and higher education providers: Assuring and
achieving quality in higher education is the primary responsibility of higher
education providers and their staff.
2. Quality and
students: The education provided to students must always be of high quality
whatever the learning outcomes pursued.
3. Quality and society: The quality of higher education
provision is judged by how well it meets the needs of society, engenders public
confidence and sustains public trust.
4. Quality and government: Governments have a role in
encouraging and supporting quality higher education.
5. Quality and accountability: It is the responsibility of
higher education providers and quality assurance and accreditation bodies to
sustain a strong commitment to accountability and provide regular evidence of
quality.
6. Quality and the role of quality assurance and
accreditation bodies: Quality assurance and accreditation bodies, working with
higher education providers and their leadership, staff and students, are
responsible for the implementation of processes, tools, benchmarks and measures
of learning outcomes that help to create a shared understanding of quality.
7. Quality and change: Quality higher education needs to be
flexible, creative and innovative; developing and evolving to meet students’
needs, to justify the confidence of society and to maintain diversity
Saturday, July 11, 2015
Smart Education and New Skills Thru Internet of Education
Seeking Value in
the New Education Model in Emerging Economies
Deriving
Value concept in education is what leaders in emerging economies must embrace:
Value is adding benefits at lesser costs (V
= B-C). The new educational model
must look to network innovations which are interconnected - connect to create value.
Cisco predicts that
by 2020 there will be 50 billion “things” connected to the Internet, up from 25
billion in 2015. The future is one of data analytics - the need to mine and
draw inferences on student performances. The new order provides an integration
of faculty (human ) and the digital elements. The Educational Internet of
Things (IoEd) would enable educational institutions to utilize software
strengthened sensors, machine-to-machine conversations and learning. It will
exploit technologies to harness and analyze data from the student world and then use those analyses to add value to educational
organizations.
Enhancing
value applies to any educational product or service: An education institution might offer a product
like degree/ diploma or a given service
in the form of enhancing knowledge, competency, or skill sets or just plain offer
a given social good (churning out model citizens)- in all of these categories, there
has to be value generation in the logistic chain.
Tomorrow's
educational entities will be in smart buildings (Smart education city) . There
will be smart academic infrastructure. Educational development will be
integrated with new smart cities. Such moves will generate value through
greater economies of scale.
Steps essential:
·
The psyche build up to usher in innovative change.
·
Thinking outside the usual
framework- thinking technologically right.
·
Looking beyond current knowledge
base of teachers
·
Looking beyond current functional skill sets of teachers
·
Working with a
technologically proficient team and partnering with innovative institutions to strengthen
the capacity and to induce technological motivation
·
Have a cross
disciplinary approach: What works in patient care works in student service. -
Tender, loving care (TLC) - So one could borrow from other silos.
Hardware:
The new model has to draw from the potential well of technology.
Technology is time constraining and resource intensive. Technology intervention
points are:
·
the use of laptops for elucidation in class rooms,( .ppt presentations)
·
watching videos/ you tube in classrooms,
·
coping with learning management systems,
·
engaging with peers on line for self learning by teachers,
·
engage with students on line, accepting assignments and course work on
line.
·
conducting on line tests
·
declaring results on line
There could be a host of devices
deployed to facilitate e studies:
·
Laptops,
·
Chrome books,
·
Macs,
·
iPads,
·
Windows machines
For
data analytics and predictive usage, centralization of data and of accompanying
software is of essence.
Balancing
between costs and mass drives at technology accessed 'in to' schools is essential
to ensure the preparedness of students for tomorrow's jobs. Drawing in support
from corporate entities to usher in
greater technological value build up in education is the challenge as resources
are a constraint. .
Cisco identifies the following Skills in the times of Internet of Things
Cisco - 21st Century Skills
•
Collaboration
•
Communication
•
Creativity
•
Problem solving
•
ICT proficiency
•
Critical thinking
Cisco - Global leadership skills
•
Global mindset
•
Languages proficiency
•
Cultural awareness
•
Team player
•
Professionalism
•
Work ethics
Cisco - Entrepreneurial Skills
•
Opportunity recognition
•
Self-direction
•
Persuasion
•
Planning skills
•
Risk taking
•
Resourcefulness
Cisco quotes top 10 skills for the future
workforce
•
Sense making
•
Social intelligence
•
Novel and adaptive thinking
•
Cross-cultural competency
•
Computational thinking
•
New-media literacy
•
Transdisciplinarity
•
Design mindset
•
Cognitive load management
•
Virtual collaboration.
The new model is about getting the people and
process in the act .
This is a part of the research work on the Internet of Education by the author. He can be contacted at jaynayar@gmail.com.
Friday, July 10, 2015
Friday, July 3, 2015
Chief Innovation Officer : University Appointment
Good Universities need to have the infrastructure and protocols in place
to pursue a scientific innovation
strategy. This would include internal and external innovation through start-up
partnership, investment and co-development of innovative projects. The emphasis
must be on the Internet of Things. The technology industry is abuzz with the IoT, with IoT equated
to the industrial revolution. A profound
transformation lies ahead in ways humans and machines interact with each other.
Universities have a facilitator role here.
Universities need to appoint a qualified Chief Innovation Officer for facilitating the Internet of Things.
Universities need to appoint a qualified Chief Innovation Officer for facilitating the Internet of Things.
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Towards Quality: Role and Responsibility of Lecturers
Towards
Quality: Role and Responsibility of Lecturers
The purpose of this rudimentary
Paper is merely to facilitate discussions on the subject matter and to attempt
to understand and appreciate the expectations in regard to the role and the
constraints testing a lecturer at undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Some
issues are raised here with the objective of provoking discussions and seeking
solutions through collective wisdom.
The paper tries to set out the
following:
a)
To identify the role and responsibility of a lecturer;
b)
For internalization of the context in which the
lecturers are working ;
c)
To place the subject in its proper perspective with a
view to initiating a discussion on the subject.
The Context:
A student remains with a school
for long years. All the time, in school, he or she is receiving knowledge and
ideas. Education at this pre-College stage has a special importance because in
these years when the human mind is most impressionable, and also because most
of the students will leave off formal education after completing class XII. The
students are under the care and influence of the pre-primary, primary, and
secondary school teachers during the most formative years of their lives. The
learning there is of considerable significance to lecturers but is an exogenous
and uncontrollable variable.
While education in the school
level is primarily national and value-oriented, the education at the
Professional College like ours is internationally biased and attempts to make
the student a global citizen adding value to the business community who are our
direct sponsors. The transition from the school to a professional mould is
quite a challenge. The international targeting makes education quite different
from what the students have been used to in the past.
Lecturers endeavour to train and mould the minds of the
young people so as to make them worthy financial and / or information
technology keen citizens. The training that we impart is supposed to
accelerate the pace of growth of the nation. That change must make for a better
and healthier nation. That means that a tremendous responsibility rests upon
the lecturer to mould young minds into valuable assets in economic building.
The Lecturer Perspective: The Limits to the Discharge
of the Responsibilities:
The Need For An Attitudinal Change
There is an emergent need to be a
catalyst for change: the transformation from a lighter syllabus to a heavy,
voluminous, technical vocabulary driven context is a tremendous challenge
before the lecturer. The difficulties of expressiveness and communication in
the student tend to be impediments. They even appear to give the student a
certain restraining complex even as he sets out for this great journey of
learning.
The Lecturer is aware that he is a
change agent here. Instilling an attitudinal change requires a conviction in
the catalyst. There has to be an
attitudinal change manifest in the individual lecturer concerned; he (or she)
needs to be galvanized with certain dynamism and a spirit of dedication that
transcends the ordinary. There has to be a powerful motivation.
The Need to Inspire as
much as to Instruct
Educators are often called instructors, but the student
seeks inspiration more than instruction perhaps in greater measure. The task is
daunting when weighed against the background of the fact that at least some of
the students tend to be working long hours before attending classes. By the time they reach the lecturer, they are
tired if not fatigued. This is an exogenous, uncontrollable variable. The
lecturer has a motivational element to facilitate the absorption of complex
tasks.
Need to Arouse a Scientific Temper
The need to
balance between an exam driven student and the need to instill deep abiding
knowledge in him (which his sponsor and our Management expects) is a challenge.
To make the student mind dedicated to an evidence adducing learning is a
cumbersome task. Given that reading habits are weak in the formative years, and
that the influence of the visual media is pronounced, this is a daunting task.
Despite attempts, sometimes, students still expect lecturers to coach rather
than facilitate. The lecturer’s efforts to challenge the
student to higher responsibilities of independent reading are fraught with
mental obstacles in the recipient himself.
The
need to post him for examination
This
is what the student expects most in the lecturer. The student’s singular worry
is how to pass the examination. The benchmark for the performance has also
gradually turned to be the performance of the student as a group in the
examination. This requires a certain re-orientation on the part of the lecturer
by consciously driving towards exam focus rather than knowledge imparting. Are
lecturers fully examination technique driven? Most lecturers would think so;
but then are there reflections of such a belief in the ground reality?
The
need to cover vast portions in given time frames.
In
a given Semester (trimester) time frame, the balance between the occasional
weak comprehensive abilities of at least a segment of the students and the
short time frame is a matter of time pressure[1]. Given that students do
complain about non- availability of time after class and office hours, over the
last few years there has been a stretching of contact hours in all
specializations: from MBA to Diplomas. This has to be viewed against the
backdrop of profit motivation that is being suggested in the business
development context.
The
need for effective Faculty time
Sometimes
faculty are burdened with correspondence and administrative duties at least
indirectly. Faculty has to think, read and write to improve.
The
need for Unanimity of Approach
The
lecturers need to present a coherent approach with regard to the approach to
the student community, particularly in regard to discipline. The Team View
strengthens the students to respond positively.
The
need for Coordinated Approach to Learning
Often,
lecturers are seen to be working in departmentalized islands with a
willingness but no-opportunity to share with colleagues. This is manifest
sometimes even to the student. Lecturers may be observed not to move in tandem,
but as departmentalized bureaucracies. Experience sharing is a regular event or
a semi-annual event, which needs to be institutionalized. There has to be organizational
memory and collective wisdom.
Need
for Long Termism rather than Ad-Hocism
Gradually,
there appears to be a short ‘termism’ in our approach to solutions and people.
This has a brought about incertitude in the minds of the affected. As organizations
are permanent, even if individuals are transient, there appears to be conscious
need for institutionalizing long ‘termism’ particularly with the younger
stakeholders. There is a need for identification with the institution in
totality in case there has to be longer-term research orientation.
The Perspective Shift:
Lecturers
need to move over to be a place of ‘excellence in knowledge’, to ensure
personal development of both the students and the staff and bring in more
confidence in themselves. How exactly do
we do that?
[1]
Selectivism in subjects / modules/ chapters may often misfire. So there is need
for comprehensive coverage.
Comments on this paper may be sent to Dr. Jayaram
Nayar at jaynayar@gmail.com
Sunday, March 15, 2015
The Internet of Things- in Education (IoEd)
The Internet
of Things (IoT) is a term used to refer to internet based
connectivity by bringing men and machines together. Such connectivity
will harness people, processes, data and machines in a path breaking
manner. It will utilize information and
apply intelligence to data to enable informed decisions. The
Internet of Things is the next step in the evolution of the internet. This concept suggests augmented "smart" 'things', which are networked effectively among
themselves and with operating men over advanced connections.
The Internet of Things would result in an increase of networked devices which are in common use. Such devices may
include desktops, laptops, smart phones, etc. Their numbers are to increase from the current 4.5 billion to 30 billion by 2020 to over 50 billion by 2050. As the world becomes tech savy, personal implants could aid technological connectivity. As such a technological techntonic shift occurs, education sector cannot lag behind. In fact, education
should be in the forefront of things as education is the biggest influence on
the minds of future citizens. The Internet of Things should reach schools and Universities as the Internet of Education (IoEd) .
Internet of Education (IoEd) is about
integrating technology with learning. IoEd is about being student-centric with
technological support. IoEd is about creating smarter educational products;
facilitating a new educational experience through use of technological
skills.These technological skills and mechanical devices have to establish connectivity to delivery platforms.
IoEd requires conceptual clarity among mass base of teachers/ faculty. This calls for training teachers / higher education faculty to
sophisticated levels so that IoEd reaches out through key partners to the most
important stakeholder in education : the student from a platform of technology.
To lay the foundations of IoEd, one has to comprehend the
fundamentals of the infrastructure.
IoEd infrastructure
a) Device
connectivity. Network and network programming which will serve as the
focal point;
b) Cloud
architecture;
c) Data
analytics;
d) Cyber
security;
e) Mobile
application development;
f) Other device
application development.
Pre-Requisites
for IofEd
- Education sector has to understand and appreciate the changing technological world order;
- Educators have to become tech- based and operations management obsessed rather than being just knowledge givers; ( teaching to be seen as operational deliverables rather than just services rendered )
- Education industry has to work with both hardware and software firms so as to deliver student value;
- Students have to be instilled with network management and integrating technological connections;
- Networking and network programming have to be an in-alienable part of school education;
- IT companies should work with educators, schools and universities as partners;
- There should evolve a technology-education partnership which will re-design curricula in both schools and higher educational institutions.
o Network
o Mathematical
and programming skills;
o Problem
solving skills ranging from simple to complex;
o Thinking
and critical thinking skills;
o Data
anlytics skills;
o Communication
skills: oral, and written;
o Group
and collaborative skills;
o Learning
skills for knowedge assimilation;
o Research
skills;
o Learning
Skills to co-exist with men and machines.
Every teaching
programme must be a blended learning model insisting on 60 % hands on
practice and just about 40 % of traditional style teaching (classroom learning)
.
This 60 %
component must be sub divided to cover:
· web
labs;
· web
based researching;
· web
helped simulator styled studies;
· access
to digital libraries with earmarked library hours;
· inducing
self learning through virtual classroom sessions;
· industry
focusing on learning games;
· webinars;
· depending
on Podcasts;
· Video
learning; (using Youtube effectively)
All core
learning must be imparted through the medium of technology so that human
intervention is minimized. The student must be encouraged to seek and
learn rather than hear and learn.
IoEd devices
that would be connected for optimal education delivery:
1. Laptops
2. Mobile
Smart phones
3. Tablets
4. Desktop
PC
5. Televisions
6. Ordinary
Cell phones
7. Radios
Learner
preferences and parental/ stakeholder affordability have both to be studied and would have to
be contextualized for delivery to each geographical area. Socio-economic
segmentation should be the basis for adapting delivery software to the
available order of devices.
IOEd is
futuristic. It should be the disruptive technique to lead education into the
future.
Copyright of this article and its contents vests with the author of this blog: Jayaram Nayar.
He can be contacted at email: jaynayar@gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)